Mandatory first author step

CHIATECH Review Engine

A privacy-preserving evidence review that maps manuscript structure, reporting completeness, reproducibility, integrity and scholarly metadata into distinct actions for authors and qualified human editors.

Review a DOCX now Download report template

Privacy-preserving manuscript review

The DOCX is read locally in your browser. The full manuscript is not uploaded by this tool. If you authorise scholarly-registry verification, only the manuscript title, detected DOI strings and a small sample of reference lines are queried against Crossref.

Manuscript intake

Run the standards review

Manuscript title Corresponding-author email Primary journal domain Article type Blinded manuscript DOCX Verify detected DOIs, sampled references and title similarity against the Crossref scholarly metadata registry. I am authorised to review this manuscript and understand that the result supports—but does not replace—licensed similarity screening, editorial assessment or peer review. I authorise CHIATECH JOURNAL to send the report summary and my contact email to the relevant section editor and Managing Editor. The manuscript file itself remains in my browser and is not sent by this tool.

Your review report will appear hereUpload the blinded DOCX and complete the manuscript profile. The result can be downloaded as a separate Word document.

Evidence model

What the engine reviews

Deterministic checks are mapped to journal policy and internationally recognised reporting and publication-integrity principles.

Journal alignment

Domain fit, problem statement, contribution and practical relevance.

Reporting completeness

Article-specific structure and signals for CONSORT, PRISMA, STROBE, CARE, COREQ, ARRIVE, CHEERS or related guidance.

Reference integrity

In-text/reference matching, DOI extraction and live Crossref metadata verification.

Originality signals

Internal repeated-sequence analysis and prior-title metadata matches for human follow-up.

AI-use transparency

Disclosure and model-signature signals without presenting unreliable style inference as proof.

Editorial routing

A readiness score plus distinct action lists for the author and qualified human editors.

Standards compass

Designed around transparent publishing—not acceptance automation

The evidence map reflects current publication-transparency, metadata, identifier and reporting expectations. These sources guide the checks; none endorses this journal or replaces discipline-specific review.

DOAJ transparency principles Crossref metadata practices ORCID iD guidance EQUATOR reporting guidelines NLM scientific and editorial quality COPE publication ethics